Re: [Chicken-users] Posix "realpath"

[Jim Ursetto]

On Apr 1, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:

> On Apr 1, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Matt Welland wrote:
> 
>> Note that normalize-path is not the same as realpath and that although 
>> realpath would be nice to have calling the system realpath works just fine 
>> and so this is a suggestion and not a request ....
> 
> What is "the system realpath"?

Specifically, I don't understand from your mail whether you have successfully 
bound realpath(3) in your own code, whether you want this binding to be added 
to the posix unit, or whether you wanted a reimplementation in pure Scheme.  
I'm quite confused, sorry.