[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Why doesnot "(+ 1/2 1/3)" equal to 5/6 ?
From: |
.alyn.post. |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Why doesnot "(+ 1/2 1/3)" equal to 5/6 ? |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Nov 2012 18:59:33 -0700 |
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 01:30:44AM -0000, z_axis wrote:
> Welcome to Racket v5.3.
> -> (+ 1/2 1/3)
> 5/6
>
If you look carefully at your below message, you have unbalanced
parenthesis, which I was joking about when I spoke of a syntax
error. The error did not affect the clarity of what you were
asking. Consider my comment a too-subtle "like a joke only not
as funny." missive.
> BTW, what do the following message mean ?
> (use numbers)
> ; loading /usr/local/lib/chicken/6/numbers.import.so ...
>
> Note: re-importing already imported identifier: +
>
> Note: re-importing already imported identifier: -
>
> Note: re-importing already imported identifier: *
>
> Note: re-importing already imported identifier: /
> ......
>
Chicken Scheme has a small "base system" that contains a minimal
feature set. Certain eggs (specifically numbers and utf8) will
amend this basic feature set with more powerful versions of
existing routine.
These messages are describing that phenomenon: the routine '+'
exists in the core Chicken Scheme system, but does not, as you
have observed, implement the full numeric tower. The numbers
egg replaces the core '+' routine with it's own, as it does
everything the core '+' does and substantially more.
-Alan
> Best Regards!
>
>
> 在 Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:17:23 -0000,.alyn.post.
> <address@hidden> 写道:
>
> >On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:57:33PM -0000, z_axis wrote:
> >>
> >>>(+ (+ 1/2 1/3)
> >>
> >>Warning: cannot represent exact fraction - coerced to flonum: "1/2"
> >>Warning: cannot represent exact fraction - coerced to flonum: "1/3"
> >>0.8333333333333331/2 1/3)
> >>
> >>
> >>In racket, it is 5/6. And as i know it is 5/6 for any lisp
> >>implementation.
> >>
> >>
> >>Sincerely!
> >>
> >
> >I suspect in Racket your above code is a syntax error. ;-)
> >
> >More seriously, try this:
> >
> > (use numbers)
> > (+ (+ 1/2 1/3))
> >
> >That gives you the answer you expect.
> >
> >-Alan
>
--
.i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du