[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug)
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug) |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:28:52 +0100 (CET) |
From: Peter Bex <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug)
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:16:47 +0100
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:10:16AM +0100, Felix wrote:
>> > But why not just use ulimit? It can be set per process, so I don't see
>> > the need to have a second ulimit-like limit inside each process.
>>
>> Not everybody uses UNIX, you know.
>
> I keep forgetting not everybody is "lucky" enough to use it.
>
> More seriously, do "modern" OSes not have some sort of sane limiting
> system? ulimit must be several decades old...
Perhaps, but I really don't see a problem of allowing a limit
on heap allocation in the runtime system.
cheers,
felix
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), Felix, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), Peter Bex, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), John Cowan, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), Felix, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), Peter Bex, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), John Cowan, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug),
Felix <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug), Jim Ursetto, 2013/02/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures, Arthur Maciel, 2013/02/02
Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures, Arthur Maciel, 2013/02/02