[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] and-let* syntax too permissive?
|
From: |
Peter Bex |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] and-let* syntax too permissive? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 30 Jun 2013 15:10:59 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:34:02AM +0200, Michele La Monaca wrote:
> I think it's dangerous to leave it as it is. For example:
>
> #;3> (and-let* (((or #f #t))) 1) ;; correct
> 1
> #;4> (and-let* ((or #f #t)) 1) ;; WRONG! -> a stricter syntax
> would catch this error
> #f
I agree this type of mistake should be caught. Attached is a patch
that fixes this (and adds a test for it).
Thanks for reporting this bug!
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net