Re: [Chicken-users] Updating the zmq egg

[Dan Leslie]

I'd stick with zmq, particularly considering that you've already begun
updating the egg. It also looks like it has a greater amount of
community and developer support.

-Dan

Matt Gushee <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Dan Leslie <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>> You might want to consider the nanomsg egg, which doesn't appear to have
>> a wiki page yet.
>>
>> https://github.com/Adellica/chicken-nanomsg
>>
>
> Oh, great, yet another alternative to consider! :-/  Well, maybe. I've
> never heard of nanomsg before. Any idea how widely-used/well-supported it
> is?
>
> PS: I still think the future of the zmq egg should be addressed, even if I
> end up not using it. It doesn't seem very useful to have a library binding
> that is two major versions behind. Unless someone is using it in
> production, I'd say it should either be updated or withdrawn.
>
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

-- 
-Dan Leslie