[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] A (somewhat) useful define-syntax example
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] A (somewhat) useful define-syntax example |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Apr 2015 18:23:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Dan Leslie scripsit:
> Earlier last week a bug was reported with the monad egg, and it exposed
> a deep flaw in how the syntax was written. In trying to fix it I found
> myself spinning my wheels and generally having a frustrating time of
> it. Thus, I took it upon myself to strip the concepts to their minimal
> and write a small example of the behaviour I wanted.
OT: I looked at this egg for the first time and noted that the syntax
forms were marked [procedure], so I fixed the markup on the wiki.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
How comes city and country to be filled with drones and rogues, our highways
with hackers, and all places with sloth and wickedness?
--W. Blith, Eng. Improver Improved, 1652