[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Segmentation violation using SSAX egg
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Segmentation violation using SSAX egg |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:24:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 04:49:10PM +1000, David Ireland wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am sporadically getting segmentation violations (about 1 out of 3 program
> executions fail) while processing these files. It is not dependent on the
> particular XML file but always occurs when about 50 have been processed
> already. Here is the error:
>
> *Error: segmentation violation Call history: ,,,
> crow.scm:524: unpack-aiml crow.scm:468: read-all *
> *crow.scm:468: buffer-ports#open-input-buffer crow.scm:469:
> ssax#ssax:xml->sxml *
Hi David,
That kind of bug can be very nasty, sorry about that!
> And an except from the code:
>
> (define (unpack-aiml file)
> (let* ((result '())
> (contents (open-input-buffer (read-all file)))
> (xml (car (get-tag (*ssax:xml->sxml contents* '()) 'aiml)))
>
> Would anyone have any suggestions how I could further debug?
The most important thing is that you're running the latest release.
Next, I'd try building a new CHICKEN with DEBUGBUILD=1 on the "make"
command line. This will insert many extra sanity checks (at the cost
of a factor 2 to 4 slowdown), and build with debugging symbols.
Remember to keep the generated C sources around, too.
Also rebuild ssax and all its dependencies with this CHICKEN, so that
it also contains the debugging stuff (ideally with CSC_OPTIONS=-k to
ensure you keep the generated sources too)
Then, you can use gdb and run the program as usual. Pinpointing the
place of the crash in C should be straightforward. Mapping it back
to Scheme might be harder (there are comments in the sources that
indicate where a generated C function is coming from).
Alternatively, if you'd like some help, post a complete program with
sample XML that triggers the crash (somewhat) reliably, and others can
help you figure it out.
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature