Re: [Chicken-users] Like 'include', but different?

[kooda]

Mark Carter <address@hidden> wrote:
> I have code where I 'include' other files. Suppose I compile that file. 
> As part of execution, it will try to load those other files, which isn't 
> what I want.
> 
> Is there a way of telling chicken that during the interpretation or 
> compilation, the file should be loaded, but during execution, don't load 
> the files?
> 

The `include` form should be what you need here. I don’t really understand
the problem you’re having. Could you post a little example of it?

Here is how (include "file.scm") should behave:
- when compiled, the include form will be rewritten with the content of the
  specified file
- when interpreted, it will behave like (load "file.scm")