Re: [Chicken-users] continuation example: different behavior from other Scheme implementations

[Ricardo Gabriel Herdt]

Am 19.10.2019 18:57 schrieb address@hidden:
> But what I forgot, and which may be the confusing part is that
> after the mapping is complete, "numbers" (in your example) will be
> assigned once again - the continuation includes everything following
> the invocation of "map". Only the REPL "cuts off" this continuation
> (otherwise you would have an infinite loop, similar to when you would
> run your example code as a non-interactive program).

Thanks again, this makes sense, I had already experienced this infinite 
loop when using a compiled version of the program.

I added a note to the wiki mentioned 
(https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Scheme_Programming/Continuations) telling 
to be aware of implementation-dependent behavior, just in case someone 
stumbles on this issue in the future.

Cheers,

Ricardo