Re: Different versions of syntax-rules

[Peter Bex]

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:58:50PM +0200, felix.winkelmann@bevuta.com wrote:
> > Is there a desire to stick to r5rs features only in the chicken-core
> > expander, or is the intention to fold the R7RS / SRFI 46 features back
> > into the chicken-core expander at some point in the future?
> 
> I haven't thought about it, and the extensions for R7RS are from Peter
> (I think). We could add them in a future version of the core system,
> I'd say. Peter, what do you think?

I seem to remember that in R7RS, an underscore matches anything, which
is not entirely compatible with R5RS, where you could actually use an
underscore as a variable name.

Besides that one nitpick, I'd be fine with copying it over to core.

Cheers,
Peter

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature