Re: "cannot coerce inexact literal to fixnum"

[Al]

On 2024-02-10 16:39, Peter Bex wrote:

> Again, these could still be bignums when run on a 32-bit platform
> (that's why the return type of s32vector-ref is defined as "integer" and
> not "fixnum")

Hm.. does this mean that using s32vector-ref and -set! always incur 
typecheck costs, no matter how I type-declare identifiers passed to / 
from them? And, furthermore, that if replace these with custom-written 
(foreign-primitive ...)'s, having integer32 args / returns, those would 
also incur typechecks, and thus never be as efficient as C...?


I've generally taken to avoiding the s32vector-ref/set! builtins. 
Instead I mostly keep data in SRFI-4 vectors and manipulate it with 
C-backed foreign-primitives, without ever extracting to fixnums. For 
example I have things like (s32vector-move1! vec src-idx dst-idx) 
(copies an element from src-idx to dst-idx). But even for these, I 
wonder what type the indexes should be declared to minimize typechecks 
at the interface between C and Chicken...? Perhaps even how to make them 
inline-able to simple C array ops?


Best, Al