[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Classpath future?
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Classpath future? |
Date: |
12 Jul 2001 22:19:48 -0600 |
>>>>> "John" == John Keiser <address@hidden> writes:
John> 3. Slowness of Contribution: Argh. I was about to volunteer to
John> write a page with the agreement. But *the FSF doesn't have it
John> online anywhere*! Argh argh argh.
They did this on purpose. I think they want maintainers to download
it from the FSF each time in case they make changes.
Tom
- Re: Classpath future?, (continued)
- Re: Classpath future?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Stuart Ballard, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, John Keiser, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/13
- Re: Classpath future?,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Classpath future?, C. Scott Ananian, 2001/07/13
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Classpath future?, Brian Jones, 2001/07/13
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Classpath future?, C. Scott Ananian, 2001/07/13
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/13
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/12
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Classpath future?, C. Scott Ananian, 2001/07/13
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/13
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Classpath future?, C. Scott Ananian, 2001/07/13
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Classpath future?, C. Scott Ananian, 2001/07/13