[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpath] Re: Question about Boolean
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpath] Re: Question about Boolean |
Date: |
21 Jul 2001 00:17:19 -0600 |
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Sturm <address@hidden> writes:
Jeff> I understand the portability concerns, but there are several
Jeff> classes in java.lang that aren't worth the trouble to merge,
Jeff> perhaps this is one.
Some classes, like Object, Class, and String, we will probably never
merge. But I think we really should try to merge as many as possible.
Not merging has a cost in terms of missed opportunities. As Java
evolves, even a class like Integer gets new things added to it.
Having this as a merged class reduces the overall burden of keeping up
with Sun. (There are also costs associated with merging of course.)
In this case I'm going to try to go the Classpath way and add
java.lang.VMClassLoader.
Tom
- Re: [Classpath] Question about Boolean, (continued)
- Re: [Classpath] Question about Boolean, C. Scott Ananian, 2001/07/19
- Re: Question about Boolean, Mark Wielaard, 2001/07/19
- Re: Question about Boolean, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/19
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Question about Boolean, C. Scott Ananian, 2001/07/19
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Question about Boolean, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/19
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Question about Boolean, C. Scott Ananian, 2001/07/19
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Question about Boolean, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/19
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Question about Boolean, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/21
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Question about Boolean, C. Scott Ananian, 2001/07/21
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Question about Boolean,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: Question about Boolean, Brian Jones, 2001/07/20
Re: Question about Boolean, Brian Jones, 2001/07/19