[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Partial Double/Float merge with libgcj
|
From: |
Tom Tromey |
|
Subject: |
Re: Partial Double/Float merge with libgcj |
|
Date: |
15 Oct 2001 16:20:11 -0600 |
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
Eric> However, I argue that this is a faster implementation (it avoids a
Eric> native call):
Eric>
Eric> public static boolean isNaN(double v)
Eric> {
Eric> return v != v;
Eric> }
This seems reasonable to me too.
Tom