Re: recent rmi additions

[Brian Jones]

Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:

> >>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> Brian> Is the $param_0 and similar stuff in the rmi code ok?  gcj -C
> Brian> doesn't seem to like it very much.
> 
> What exactly are you seeing?

Complaints that they may or are not initialized.  Using gcj 2.96.  

> As far as I know the RMI in the libgcj tree is the same as what is in
> the Classpath tree, and gcj builds it there.
> What version of gcj are you using?  Maybe there is a bug in some older
> version.  I'm using 3.1 (the cvs trunk).

Of course.  So I'll leave gcj as an option but I can't see making it
the default at this time.

Brian
-- 
Brian Jones <address@hidden>