[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: System vs Runtime SecurityManager
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: System vs Runtime SecurityManager |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 01:57:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.23i |
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 05:15:56PM -0700, John Keisr wrote:
>
> A search in the archives of Classpath would reveal much. I posted the
> message and it related specifically to Japhar.
Found it <http://www.mail-archive.com/classpath%40gnu.org/msg02455.html>.
The funny thing is that I was just trying to remove insertGNUProperties()
from the static initializer of System and make it more like the libgcj
implementation which initializes the system properties lazily. But I
guess that the problem would still be there because System has to init
System.out and friends which require native support from the java.io package.
Tricky. And I still don't completely understand why it works now.
Runtime.load() still calls System.getSecurityManager() so the cyclic
dependency seems to be still there.
Cheers,
Mark
--
Stuff to read:
<http://www.toad.com/gnu/whatswrong.html>
What's Wrong with Copy Protection, by John Gilmore