Re: gcj vs classpath merge status

[Andrew Haley]

Nic Ferrier writes:
 > As far as I can tell the Classpath/libgcj project is creating 3
 > things:
 > 
 > - a standard java source code base implementing the java libs
 > - native jni libs to implement the native parts of the libs
 > - native cni libs to implement the native parts of the libs for gcj
 > 
 > As such we should try to reduce the source code differences
 > between the CLasspath java and the GCJ java.

Sure, but CNI is a much better interface for performance -- and also
legibility.

Andrew.