[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AWT?
From: |
John Leuner |
Subject: |
Re: AWT? |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:09:52 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
> Zach> Zach Smith <address@hidden> writes: Can anyone tell me what
> Zach> the status of Classpath AWT is? I may be interesting in helping
> Zach> on that part of the project. I can write X/Motif code (and Java
> Zach> code) for it.
>
> Brian> The AWT is not completely functional and in fact can only be
> Brian> tested/used with some CVS version of gcj at the moment (as far I can
> Brian> tell). The peers do need some work (GTK peers), but probably not
> Brian> nearly as much as the AWT itself.
>
> I've been doing a little AWT debugging lately. I think it is hard to
> say where the bugs really lie. For instance, fonts don't really seem
> to work (I haven't looked at why). Text fields don't seem editable.
> Bringing up a file dialog will crash your application; this appears to
> be a bug in the peers.
>
> That said, there are plenty of bugs in the Java code too. For
> instance we basically don't use the tree lock anywhere -- this is a
> big problem. You can grep for FIXME in java/awt to see other areas
> needing help.
Yeah, there are lots of bugs, but I'm sure they could be fixed with a little
bit of time and effort. We would appreciate it if you could help us identify
what needs work (Zach).
Tom, you have these weird X-Zippy headers in your mails.
John Leuner
- AWT?, Zach Smith, 2002/03/14