[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Initialization and ProtectionDomain/String
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: Initialization and ProtectionDomain/String |
Date: |
03 Oct 2002 19:30:29 +0200 |
Hi,
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 18:00, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> The recent change to java.lang.String (aug 13, v1.50) add a call to
> Character.zeroBasedStringValue() which (inadvertently?) makes
> java.lang.Character part of the "CORE CLASS" initializers (because String
> is a core class, and the static initializer of String invokes a method in
> Character, causing the initialization of Character). Character should
> be either marked as a CORE CLASS or the shared method should be moved
> to java.lang.String.
Thanks for catching that. I had tested it with Kissme that didn't seem
to have a problem with the initializer order. But I have committed your
patch since it makes the implementation behave as documented in
Runtime.java.
Thanks,
Mark
--
No.
> Should I include quotations after my reply?
- Re: Initialization and ProtectionDomain/String,
Mark Wielaard <=