[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes'
From: |
Archie Cobbs |
Subject: |
Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes' |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:30:19 -0800 (PST) |
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > I've been working on a new JVM and trying to figure out how
> > modify the "vm/reference" classpath classes into something that
> > this JVM particular can support.
>
> Fun! Do you have specific needs that non of the current ones fullfill or
> do you just like the challenge?
The main reason is that I just want one of my own for the fun of it! :-)
That also means I understand it and can debug it competently if something
breaks. Other motivations are portability/suitabilty for use on embedded
systems. E.g. I'm tired of programming in C all the time when programming
in Java would be so much nicer, but is not practical for various reasons.
This is a spare time project so it's not getting as many time slices as
I'd like, so don't expect anything useful out of me for a while. However
I would not have considered attempting such a project if Classpath didn't
exist, so.. thanks :-)
Cheers,
-Archie
__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * Precision I/O * http://www.precisionio.com
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', (continued)
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Brian Jones, 2003/03/01
- RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Jeroen Frijters, 2003/03/02
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes',
Archie Cobbs <=