[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.lang.Class patches
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: java.lang.Class patches |
Date: |
16 Apr 2003 22:47:03 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>>>>> "Jeroen" == Jeroen Frijters <address@hidden> writes:
>> Not sure if we really want to be bug compatible in this case.. ?
Jeroen> I think we should, given the fact that Sun says (in the above
Jeroen> bug report):
Jeroen> "The documentation of Class.newInstance needs to be modified
Jeroen> to document the current behaviour.
If they do document this in the Class documentation, then at least our
course is clear :-)
Tom
- Re: java.lang.Class patches, (continued)
- RE: java.lang.Class patches, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/04/04
- RE: java.lang.Class patches, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/04/05
- RE: java.lang.Class patches, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/04/07
- RE: java.lang.Class patches, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/04/09
- RE: java.lang.Class patches, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/04/11
- Re: java.lang.Class patches,
Tom Tromey <=
- RE: java.lang.Class patches, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/04/11
- RE: java.lang.Class patches, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/04/11
- RE: java.lang.Class patches, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/04/12
- RE: java.lang.Class patches, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/04/17