|
From: | Per Bothner |
Subject: | Re: GNU Classpath 0.06 created |
Date: | Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:51:32 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030612 |
Mark Wielaard wrote:
My thinking was that the 0.0x releases are actually the pre-releases while we work towards the first real GNU Classpath 1.0 release. People can combine these pre-releases with their own VMs like gcj, kissme, jikesRVM, Jaos, etc already do. But as long as we don't have at least a minimum of functionality to offer (we are hoping that 1.0 will have the equivalent functionality as core libraries that come with some proprietary 1.1 JDKs) and a stable/maintainable VM interface we cannot call it a real release.
If you've created a cvs tag, and given it a real version number, I'd call it a release, even if it's not a 1.0 relase. alpha.gnu.org has outlived its usefulness (evidenced by the fact that it is little used) now that "alpha" code is available in CVS for most projects. Note that alpha.gnu.org is not mirrored the way ftp.gnu.org is. -- --Per Bothner address@hidden http://per.bothner.com/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |