[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException]
From: |
Etienne Gagnon |
Subject: |
Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException] |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:10:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
Just a little note:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 02:32:49PM +1000, Stephen Crawley wrote:
> I cannot see for the life of me where you are got this "different
> semantics" idea from. The documentation for the exception defines its
> semantics as:
The semantic difference comes from the inheritance hierarchy.
java.lang.Exception is documented as:
The class Exception and its subclasses are a form of Throwable that
indicates conditions that a reasonable application might want to
catch.
A reasonable application should not expect a "standard" method not to
be yet implemented, IMHO.
Etienne
--
Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], (continued)
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Stephen Crawley, 2003/09/28
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Stephen Crawley, 2003/09/28
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Etienne Gagnon, 2003/09/28
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Stephen Crawley, 2003/09/29
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Etienne Gagnon, 2003/09/29
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Dalibor Topic, 2003/09/29
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException],
Etienne Gagnon <=
- Re: NYIException, Dalibor Topic, 2003/09/28
RE: NYIException, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/09/28
NYIException, Andy Walter, 2003/09/29
RE: NYIException, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/09/29
Re: NYIException, Per Bothner, 2003/09/29