[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NYIException
From: |
Jeroen Frijters |
Subject: |
RE: NYIException |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:31:13 +0200 |
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Out of interest (and please forgive me if this has already been
> discussed at length) why have dummy methods at all? Wouldn't it be
> better to have a compile time failure for unimplemented methods?
I think so, but sometimes (e.g. when implementing interfaces or
extending abstract classes), you're required to provide the methods, but
I agree that not having the unimplemented method is the cleanest
solution.
Regards,
Jeroen
- NYIException, (continued)
RE: NYIException,
Jeroen Frijters <=