[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?
From: |
Andrew Haley |
Subject: |
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ? |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 11:45:50 +0100 |
Michael Koch writes:
> Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 10:27 schrieb Andrew Haley:
> >
> > Well, that's the question: do we make Classpath harder to debug /
> > read in order to optimize the performance of some unfree C
> > compilers?
>
> It's not bad to support other compilers too but this should should not
> be used to make the code unreadable and hard to understand. If its
> hard to achieve better drop support for some compilers.
We weren't talking about dropping any support: merely a performance
decrease for some old unfree compilers.
Andrew.
- Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Michael Koch, 2004/08/03
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Ingo Prötel, 2004/08/03
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Michael Koch, 2004/08/03
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Michael Koch, 2004/08/03
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Roman Kennke, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Ingo Prötel, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Andrew Haley, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Michael Koch, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?,
Andrew Haley <=
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Michael Koch, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Andrew Haley, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Mark Wielaard, 2004/08/08
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Andrew Haley, 2004/08/09
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Dalibor Topic, 2004/08/09
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Michael Koch, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Ingo Prötel, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Michael Koch, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Tom Tromey, 2004/08/04
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Roman Kennke, 2004/08/03