[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Which JVM?
From: |
Thomas Zander |
Subject: |
Re: Which JVM? |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:26:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.50 |
On Sunday 12 December 2004 17:40, Chris Gray wrote:
> On Sunday 12 December 2004 12:29, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > Kaffe: looks dead; last development release almost a year ago (not to
> > mention stable releases)
>
> Rumours of Kaffe's death seem premature. On a typical day there are 5 or
> 6 commits to CVS, and a couple of human-to-human messages on the
> address@hidden list. If anything, Dalibor is hyper-active. :)
I suggest making a release then, without releases (and monthly snapshots
are also releases) the perception is not going to get much better since the
downloads found on the site can't be called anywhere near representative if
you guys still work on it.
> > sableVM: website is dead.
>
> http://sablevm.org looks pretty active to me, and the latest news is only
> a few weeks old ...
The site did not respond to port 80 at all when I checked.
> Don't give up too easily!
Cheers!
--
Thomas Zander
pgp0M5rmgvErQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Which JVM?, Thomas Zander, 2004/12/12
- Re: Which JVM?, Mark Wielaard, 2004/12/12
- Re: Which JVM?, Robert Schuster, 2004/12/12
- Re: Which JVM?, Chris Gray, 2004/12/12
- Re: Which JVM?,
Thomas Zander <=
- Re: Which JVM?, Etienne Gagnon, 2004/12/12
- Re: Which JVM?, Stephen Crawley, 2004/12/12
- Re: Which JVM?, Dalibor Topic, 2004/12/13