[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit
From: |
Roman Kennke |
Subject: |
Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:07:02 +0100 |
Am Freitag, den 04.03.2005, 16:03 +0100 schrieb Mark Wielaard:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 19:34 +0100, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > When I have this ready, I will include both
> > the antlr sources and the generated .java files in the classpath source
> > tree, so that we have no additional dependency. The question here is, is
> > it necessary that the generated .java files are formatted and commented
> > just like normal source files? This can easily become a maintainence
> > nightmare... What are your opinions?
>
> I am a bit afraid of the use of various/different parser generators for
> the core classes.
This issue is already resolved. I decided to write a parser for RTF
myself, without relying on a parser generator. This allows for some more
flexiblity on my side, and is a good refresh for my skills ;-)
/Roman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
- javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Sven de Marothy, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Dalibor Topic, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Per Bothner, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Dalibor Topic, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Sven de Marothy, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Dalibor Topic, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Mark Wielaard, 2005/03/04
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit,
Roman Kennke <=
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/03