[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?)
From: |
Chris Pickett |
Subject: |
benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?) |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 18:29:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) |
Hi David,
That's a non-free license.
http://osl-www.cs.umass.edu/DaCapo/gcbm.html#License_and_copyright
This is generally what's accepted to define free software:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
Maybe we need a replacement for DaCapo as well. Thanks for the
suggestion though, it's always nice to know about new benchmark suites
from an academic perspective (I still use SPECjvm98 actively, so I may
as well look into DaCapo at some point). It's somewhat surprising, I
think at least some of those component programs are actually free (this
may be the case for SPEC too, but I'm not sure).
We also have an AspectJ benchmark suite at:
http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/benchmarks/
but I don't know if any free VM is actually capable of running this code
(still, that means it's a good suite, right?). SableVM users certainly
had problems with AspectJ in the optimizing compiler class I'm the TA
for. I'd be interested in hearing from other VM developers if they can
run it.
Then there's Ashes, from Sable as well, but it's somewhat older. This
should be freely redistributable.
There's the JOlden set of benchmarks, often used as a good small example
for harder problems like pointer analysis, but there doesn't appear to
be any license for them, i.e. just copyright applies (we may try to get
that cleared up though).
Then there's the Java Grande Forum Suite, but I don't think it's free
either (still, it can break our VM at the commandline so it's a good test).
Cheers,
Chris
David P Grove wrote:
It depends on what your definition of free is, but you night want to
checkout the DaCapo benchmarks
(http://osl-www.cs.umass.edu/DaCapo/gcbm.html). The main obligation of
the license is that if you use the benchmarks you need to cite them
correctly and report the version number of the benchmark suite.
These also have the advantage of almost all running on Jikes RVM +
classpath (the exceptions are due to incomplete AWT support in classpath).
--dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
- Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, Archie Cobbs, 2005/03/07
- Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/08
- Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, Archie Cobbs, 2005/03/08
- Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/08
- Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, Archie Cobbs, 2005/03/08
- Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/08
- Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, Archie Cobbs, 2005/03/08
- Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, Chris Pickett, 2005/03/08
- Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, Chris Pickett, 2005/03/08
- Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, David P Grove, 2005/03/08
- benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?),
Chris Pickett <=
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), David P Grove, 2005/03/08
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Per Bothner, 2005/03/08
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Chris Pickett, 2005/03/08
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Chris Pickett, 2005/03/08
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Chris Pickett, 2005/03/08
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Dalibor Topic, 2005/03/09
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), David P Grove, 2005/03/09
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Chris Pickett, 2005/03/09
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Stephen Crawley, 2005/03/09
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Archie Cobbs, 2005/03/10