RE: cons 2.3.1 release?

[Nadim Khemir]

Timothee, 

Don't expect anything to happen. I pointed exactly the same problem months
ago. 2.3.0 is the best way to kill cons, it's so broken that I almost gave
up using cons, till some generous soul pointed to CVS.

There is a python implementation that supports parallel construction (search
for SCons) it's a new product but it's not worse than 2.3.0. Hope this
helps.

Nadim.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothee Besset [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:24 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: cons 2.3.1 release?
> 
> Last official cons release is 2.3.0, about a year ago. I know the CVS
> version has several things fixed, cause 2.3.0 doesn't work for me and I
> have to use CVS on some projects (for a dependencies fix, and external
> commands I think).
> 
> A new release would be a good idea? Is Rajesh still maintaining cons as
> stated on the web page?
> 
> My over problem is the lack of a working parallel cons (more on that
> later).
> 
> TTimo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
> Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/