[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la
From: |
Jeremiah Benham |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:01:34 -0500 |
ok. I able to reproduce this on my debian unstable box. I did a
grep -r libjack * in the top level dir and it has not returned anything.
I thought it was the jack.pc but jack.pc is the same as my Jaunty
system.
Oddly git compiles without trouble.
I will look into it.
Jeremiah
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 15:09 +0200, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 02/09/2009 alle 07.56 -0500, Jeremiah Benham ha scritto:
> > On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 10:00 +0200, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I'm trying to have a recent denemo in debian; I had already packaged
> > > 0.8.6, but while I waited the necessary 10 days before the upload 0.8.8
> > > went out, so I started packaging it (see [0]).
> > >
> > > But while 0.8.6 compiled flawlessly, 0.8.8 doesn't, and complains the
> > > lack of file libjack.la. I did some searching, and found out that:
> > > - the file is dropped on purpose from the package which used to contain
> > > it ([1])
> > > - though the file is missing also in Ubuntu Jaunty, there denemo
> > > compiles without problems
> > > - the error comes out even if I pass --enable-jack=no to ./configure
> > > (which is no surprise, since anyway the default value is "no")
> > >
> > >
> > > I would appreciate any hint on how to solve the problem
> >
> > Strange. I use Jaunty but have not seen this.
>
> Indeed: in Jaunty all works fine - though the libjack.la file is absent,
> exactly as in Debian.
>
> > Does this fix it:
> > make clean; ./configure; make
>
> no... in fact this is what the .deb package creation does... and it
> fails
>
> (anyway, I tried also outside of the .deb package creation)
>
> >
> > Does it run fine compiled with no ./configure
> > option?
>
> no... I tried to add the options only because of the problem.
>
> I found someone with a similar problem
> (
> http://www.linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=986&start=15&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
> ), but with an older version (0.8.8 still wasn't out) - and recall that 0.8.6
> compiles fine to me.
>
> I'm attaching the output of make, where it stops, and if anyone is
> interested I can provide ssh access to a machine with a fresh debian
> unstable or testing and the denemo sources.
>
> Pietro
- [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la, Pietro Battiston, 2009/09/02
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la, Jeremiah Benham, 2009/09/02
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la, Pietro Battiston, 2009/09/02
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la,
Jeremiah Benham <=
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la, Jeremiah Benham, 2009/09/02
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la, Pietro Battiston, 2009/09/02
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la, Pietro Battiston, 2009/09/03
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la, Pietro Battiston, 2009/09/03
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la, Richard Shann, 2009/09/03
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la, Pietro Battiston, 2009/09/03
- Debian packages (was: Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 0.8.8 and libjack.la), Pietro Battiston, 2009/09/12