[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20 |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:51:59 +0000 |
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 23:01 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> Maybe I should set autoconf to do:
> If (check to see if it finds the header and .a file)
> Include it in, add .a to LDADD as if it was another object
> Else
> Link guile as normal
>
> Jeremiah
Well I'm not familiar with that stuff - I could imagine a configure flag
that would say --static-link-guile that would then link Denemo to the
libsrfi-1... library that mxe generates.
I am still battling with getting guile working properly on windows
though - the srfi issues seem to be fixed with the latest email from
Mark Weaver on address@hidden but, strangely the make-regexp
primitive is missing. I'll check his suggested fix into git. It requires
a patch to the srfi/srfi-1xxx and 60 scripts in guile as well. With
these Denemo is booting without problematic error messages. But the
symbol make-regexp is not defined which AFAIK is built-in to scheme.
I have tried executing the test-guile.exe which
make guile
builds, but it does not run, not finding ice-9/boot-9.scm in the load
path. I tried setting that environment variable, but without success.
All very frustrating, but both guile-user and mxe mailing lists seem
very helpful.
Hah! as I write this Mark Weaver has emailed saying:
> However the symbol make-regexp is undefined.
This is an unrelated problem, namely that './configure' is apparently
unable to find a suitable POSIX regexp library. I think you'll find
that HAVE_REGCOMP is not defined in 'config.h', in which case
'make-regexp' will not be available. Search for 'regex' and 'rxposix'
in 'config.log' for details on what went wrong.
>From which it seems we may need more help from mxe guys ...
I'll check the fixes for srfi stuff in now...
Richard
>
> On Feb 9, 2013 5:26 AM, "Richard Shann" <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> With the help of the guile list I have linked denemo to the
> libguile-srfi stuff - I literally hacked the full path to the
> srfi
> library into the Makefile of denemo as I don't know how to
> tell the
> configure.ac to link to it. (So I had to use the trick of
> disabling the
> checksum count in mxe's Makefile so it used the hacked tar.gz
> without
> downloading it again).
> This gave a denemo which correctly loads srfi-1 (it requires a
> patch to
> guile so that srfi/srfi-1.scm does not try and load the
> extension, as
> detailed on the guile m/l).
> There is still some problems with the guile loading stuff,
> however. I
> thought I would try to tidy up by moving the tarball on to be
> the latest
> git master. But copying in the git master tarball and removing
> the
> patches for denemo gave me an error message on make denemo:
>
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target
> `../../denemo/libsmf/smf.c', needed
> by `libsmf_a-smf.o'. Stop.
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/home/rshann/mxe/tmp-denemo/denemo-1.0.0~rc9/libsmf'
> make[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/home/rshann/mxe/tmp-denemo/denemo-1.0.0~rc9'
>
> this despite smf.c being present:
>
> ~/mxe/tmp-denemo/denemo-1.0.0~rc9/libsmf$ ls smf.c
> smf.c
>
> it must be the ../../denemo bit which is wrong, should
> be ../../tmp-denemo or something.
>
> Any ideas? (I am expecting this to fail to link of course,
> until I hack
> in the libguile-srfi1 library...)
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 09:54 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > Should it be loading one of these?
> > find ./ -name 'libguile-srfi-srfi*.*'
> > ./usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.a
> > ./usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.la
> > ./usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.a
> > ./usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.a
> > ./usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.la
> > ./usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.a
> > ./usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.la
> > ./usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.la
> >
> > Do we need to set the guile environment variables?
> > Jeremiah
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Richard Shann
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I copied the denemo gdb and evince stuff into bin,
> usr, share,
> > etc and
> > the libfluidsynth.dll into bin and then executed
> directly from
> > bin using
> > .\gdb.exe denemo.exe
> > It segfaulted trying to load the standard guile
> module srfi_1
> > I don't
> > have much idea why I confess. The GUILE_LOAD_PATH
> looks good
> > (as
> > reported by denemo when it starts up). Here (below)
> is the
> > output to the
> > console as Denemo runs. Anyone who can give an
> insight into
> > what needs
> > adjusting please say.
> > Richard
> > D:\bin> .\gdb.exe denemo.exe
> > GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4
> > Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
> > <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> > This is free software: you are free to change and
> redistribute
> > it.
> > There is NO WARRANTY, to th
> >
> >
> > e extent permitted by law. Type "show
> > copying"
> > and "show warranty" for details.
> > This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-mingw32".
> > For bug reporting instructions, please see:
> > <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
> > Reading symbols from D:\bin/denemo.exe...done.
> > (gdb) run
> > Starting program: D:\bin/denemo.exe
> > [New Thread 3216.0x10b8]
> > Setting GUILE_LOAD_PATH=D:\share\guile;D:\share
> \guile\1.8;D:
> > \share
> > \lilypond\current\scm
> > Setting PANGO_PREFIX=D:
> > Setting GTK_PREFIX=D:
> > Setting FONTCONFIG_PATH=D:\etc\fonts
> > Setting FONTCONFIG_FILE=D:\etc\fonts\fonts.conf
> > PATH set to C:\Windows\system32\WindowsPowerShell
> \v1.0\;;C:
> > \Program
> > Files\Denemo\usr\bin;D:\bin;D:\lib
> > LILYPOND_DATA_PATH will be D:\share\lilypond\current
> if not
> > already
> > setGUILE_LOAD_PATH is D:\share\guile;D:\share\guile\
> > 1.8;D:\share\lilypond\current\scm;D:\share\denemo
> > rootdir=D:
> > bindir=D:\bin
> > rootdir=D:
> > datadir=D:\share\denemo
> >
> > systemwide == D:\etc\denemo\denemo.conf
> >
> > xmlsource == D:\etc\denemo\denemo.conf
> >
> > xmlsource == C:\Users\Guest\.denemo-1.0.0~rc9
> \denemorcV2
> >
> > GNU Denemo, a free and open music notation editor
> > (c) 1999-2005, 2009 Matthew Hiller, Adam Tee, and
> others,
> > 2010-2011
> > Richard Shann, Jeremiah Benham, Nils Gey and others.
> >
> >
> >
> > This program is provided with absolutely NO
> WARRANTY; see
> > the file COPYING for details.
> >
> > This software may be redistributed and modified
> under the
> > terms of the GNU General Public License; again, see
> the file
> > COPYING for details.
> >
> > audio driver is 'portaudio' 0
> > initializing PortAudio backend
> > [New Thread 3216.0x860]
> > [New Thread 3216.0x1464]
> > [New Thread 3216.0x10a8]
> > [New Thread 3216.0x175c]
> > opening output device 'Windows DirectSound: Primary
> Sound
> > Driver'
> > [New Thread 3216.0x14a0]
> >
> > ** (denemo.exe:3216): WARNING **:
> > The default soundfont has been loaded
> >
> > [New Thread 3216.0x10bc]
> > [New Thread 3216.0x1618]
> > [New Thread 3216.0x608]
> > [New Thread 3216.0x3f8]
> > MIDI driver is 'portmidi'
> > initializing PortMidi backend
> > registered pm_exit with atexit()
> >
> > ** (denemo.exe:3216): WARNING **: no input device
> >
> > destroying PortMidi backend
> > pm_winmm_term called
> > pm_winmm_term exiting
> >
> > ** (denemo.exe:3216): WARNING **: initializing MIDI
> backend
> > 'portmidi'
> > failed, falling back to dummy
> > initializing dummy MIDI backend
> > [New Thread 3216.0x17bc]
> > [New Thread 3216.0xf98]
> > Denemo icon not used
> > (denemo.exe:3216): GLib-CRITICAL **:
> g_utf8_to_utf16:
> > assertion `str !=
> > NULL' failed
> > recent (null)
> > Version 1_0_0_Win
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x6bfacc2f in scm_cell () from C:\Program Files
> \Denemo\usr\bin
> > \libguile-17.dll
> > (gdb) where
> > #0 0x6bfacc2f in scm_cell () from C:\Program Files
> \Denemo\usr
> > \bin
> > \libguile-17.dll
> > #1 0x6bfc2489 in scm_c_make_subr () from C:\Program
> Files
> > \Denemo\usr
> > \bin\libguile-17.dll
> > #2 0x6bfa8ee6 in create_gsubr () from C:\Program
> Files\Denemo
> > \usr\bin
> > \libguile-17.dll
> > #3 0x63f81237 in scm_init_srfi_1 () from C:\Program
> Files
> > \Denemo\usr
> > \bin\libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3-3.dll
> > #4 0x0057d59d in scm_dynamic_call ()
> > #5 0x0058c7ef in load_extension ()
> > #6 0x0058c83a in scm_load_extension ()
> > #7 0x005310e0 in ceval ()
> > #8 0x0053413b in scm_i_eval_x ()
> > #9 0x00534284 in scm_primitive_eval_x ()
> > #10 0x00522d18 in scm_primitive_load ()
> > #11 0x00530b43 in ceval ()
> > #12 0x00532713 in scm_apply ()
> > #13 0x00531bb9 in scm_call_0 ()
> > #14 0x0054dd61 in scm_dynamic_wind ()
> > #15 0x0053160f in ceval ()
> > #16 0x0052db58 in ceval ()
> > #17 0x00532713 in scm_apply ()
> > #18 0x00531bb9 in scm_call_0 ()
> > #19 0x00542635 in apply_thunk ()
> > #20 0x005427e0 in scm_c_with_fluid ()
> > #21 0x005427af in scm_with_fluid ()
> > #22 0x0053160f in ceval ()
> > #23 0x00532713 in scm_apply ()
> > #24 0x00531bb9 in scm_call_0 ()
> > #25 0x0054dd61 in scm_dynamic_wind ()
> > #26 0x0053160f in ceval ()
> > #27 0x0052db58 in ceval ()
> > #28 0x0052eff0 in ceval ()
> > #29 0x0052db58 in ceval ()
> > #30 0x0052eea3 in ceval ()
> > #31 0x0052eff0 in ceval ()
> > #32 0x0052d66b in scm_eval_body ()
> > #33 0x00532dce in call_closure_1 ()
> > #34 0x00533399 in scm_map ()
> > #35 0x00531130 in ceval ()
> > #36 0x0052eea3 in ceval ()
> > #37 0x0052d989 in ceval ()
> > #38 0x0053413b in scm_i_eval_x ()
> > #39 0x00534284 in scm_primitive_eval_x ()
> > #40 0x00522d18 in scm_primitive_load ()
> > #41 0x005239a8 in scm_c_catch ()
> > #42 0x00523a7c in scm_internal_catch ()
> > #43 0x0049a3ee in eval_file_with_catch
> > (address@hidden "D:\\share\
> \denemo\\actions
> > \
> > \denemo.scm")
> > at view.c:175
> > #44 0x0049a4b8 in load_scheme_init () at view.c:4799
> > #45 0x004b1620 in inner_main (closure=0x0, argc=1,
> > argv=0x372b68) at
> > view.c:6098
> > #46 0x00509be1 in invoke_main_func ()
> > #47 0x0054bb79 in c_body ()
> > #48 0x005239a8 in scm_c_catch ()
> > #49 0x0054bb3a in scm_i_with_continuation_barrier ()
> > #50 0x0054bbe7 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier ()
> > #51 0x0053bd21 in scm_i_with_guile_and_parent ()
> > #52 0x0053bcf2 in scm_with_guile ()
> > #53 0x00509b6f in scm_boot_guile ()
> > #54 0x00e2c9ed in main (argc=1, argv=0x372b68) at
> main.c:464
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 09:13 +0000, Richard Shann
> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 00:26 -0600, Jeremiah Benham
> wrote:
> > > > I was able to get denemo to launch. I made sure
> that I put
> > denemo.exe
> > > > paired with the ../share/guile directory. Then I
> had to
> > comment out
> > > > load_scheme_init() in view.c. For some reason
> the is crash
> > is going on
> > > > in there.
> > > The load_scheme_init() problem is because as well
> as
> > share/guile we need
> > > share/denemo so that load_scheme_init() can get
> > actions/denemo.scm. I
> > > also installed share/fonts/truetype/denemo
> > > I think we then need some evince backends as
> well...
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, (continued)
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Jeremiah Benham, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Richard Shann, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Jeremiah Benham, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Jeremiah Benham, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Richard Shann, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Richard Shann, 2013/02/08
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Richard Shann, 2013/02/08
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Richard Shann, 2013/02/08
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Richard Shann, 2013/02/09
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Jeremiah Benham, 2013/02/10
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20,
Richard Shann <=
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Jeremiah Benham, 2013/02/11
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Richard Shann, 2013/02/11
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Richard Shann, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Denemo-devel] A useful looking link for cross compiling... Re: gtk-app-devel-list Digest, Vol 105, Issue 20, Richard Shann, 2013/02/04