|
From: | Éloi Rivard |
Subject: | Re: [Denemo-devel] XML translation |
Date: | Fri, 10 May 2013 17:38:12 +0200 |
Pleas tell me if it is ok to merge.This is simple variables renaming and code splitting.Yep I saw that. Well let's do it little by little.I updated 'refactoring' and removed the commands.c removing commit.
2013/5/10 Richard Shann <address@hidden>
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 13:12 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote:The current code executes anything in commands.c and then goes on to go
> It seems to be because of commands.c deletion. I check that.
through Default.commands picking up anything which commands.c has not
already loaded. So the current code should execute ok with a dummy
commands.c
Richard
>
>
>
> 2013/5/10 Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 11:20 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote:
> > I reworked the 'refactoring' branch, (based on intl) and
> checked the
> > user actions creation. It should be good this time. Please
> check
>
>
> I checked out the refactoring branch and built
> from ./autogen.sh on to a
> new directory, on statup I get
>
> ....
> ** (denemo:5038): WARNING **:
> A script error for
> file/script /home/denemo-user/local/share/denemo/actions/denemo.scm; the
> throw arguments are
> (#f Unbound variable: ~S (d-SetBreve) #f)
>
>
> It looks like only built-in commands are loaded :(
> there are no others in the menu system.
>
> Richard
>
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/5/9 Éloi Rivard <address@hidden>
> > There is something on the 'intl' branch. I need some
> test.
> >
> > I had to suppress spaces from actions/menus file
> paths to make
> > it work.
> >
> > I updated Defaults.commands to follow the right
> menupaths.
> >
> > You will probably need to run ./autogen.sh once to
> compile
> > successfully.
> >
> >
> >
> > Now you can update translations with :
> > cd po
> >
> > make update-po
> >
> >
> > I made some tests with a clean user (no
> ~/.denemo.xxx
> > directory). I created a command, saved it, closed
> the program,
> > launch it again, it seems to work.
> >
> > Let me know if it is mergeable.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/5/9 Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> > On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 15:19 +0200, Éloi
> Rivard wrote:
> > > Indeed people who have their own command
> file may
> > want to keep them
> > > working.
> > >
> > > There is many solutions:
> > >
> > > - Keep support for old style files in the
> code, but
> > that's not my
> > > favorite
> > >
> > > - Tell people to update their files, and
> possibly
> > give theme a script
> > > to do that
> >
> >
> > This last is fine - those who have created
> command
> > files will not have
> > many and will be easily technically savvy
> enough to
> > update them. (I just
> > realized that the spell-checker does not
> recognize
> > savvy as a good word,
> > but I am sure any one with savoir-faire will
> > understand :)
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
> >
> > « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
> >
> > « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
>
> « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
>
--
Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
« On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |