[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:34:52 +0000 |
It certainly looks good, but I haven't yet understood what exactly is
being built with success... surely not a windows installer?
I am hunting down some serious-looking trouble with the commands loading
- some commands are simply not getting loaded, and saving new commands
is not working properly. I expected this to be related to the
alphabeticalizing of commands but it seems it is not. I'm afraid it is
down to the re-factoring of the command load/storage into separate xml
and scm parts, or some such.
I am not sure which commands don't get loaded
(Edit->Select->DeleteSelectionLeaveEmpty is one, which causes
Edit->Delete to fail) and how important they are; so I don't know if the
release should stand yet.
Richard
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 16:06 +0100, Éloi Rivard wrote:
> I got back the denemo account on github. So here is a mirror of denemo
> repository :
> https://github.com/denemo/denemo
>
> It is updated every 5 minutes by my server. You can see the travis
> status on this page :
> https://travis-ci.org/denemo/denemo
>
>
> So each time anyone commits on any branch, you can check a few minutes
> later on Travis if the commit compiles.
>
> Great, isn't it ?
>
>
>
> 2013/10/28 Éloi Rivard <address@hidden>
> Hey GTK3 for windows has been officially released !
> http://www.gtk.org/download/win32.php
>
>
>
> 2013/10/23 Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> I thought so at one time, but the developers of code
> such as GTK do not
> anticipate people doing this, and so it never gets
> tested.
> We tried and got *very* close to a static build for
> Denemo cross
> compiling for windows using the mxe project. I was
> actually able to run
> Denemo under a (statically compiled) gdb on windows.
> In fact, I am still
> able to run our current Denemo builds under that
> gdb.exe which I kept
> around. That is the beauty of a statically built
> executable, it carries
> on working forever, more or less.
> You will need to look back at the emails about this -
> my memory doesn't
> serve me well enough to give a blow-by-blow account of
> what happened :(
> they all refer to mxe I expect.
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 10:17 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote:
> > Well, is gub mandatory ? Could it be possible to
> statically compile
> > every dependencies and just link them ?
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/23 Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> > On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 09:19 +0200, Éloi
> Rivard wrote:
> > > Travis run on a Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Server
> Edition 64 bit.
> >
> >
> > I think this could require quite a bit of
> delving into GUB to
> > get the
> > build working - I am not sure what the
> LilyPond project uses,
> > but
> > Jeremiah has been using Debian's stable
> distribution on 32-bit
> > architecture (but possibly slightly old in
> some way since I
> > was able to
> > build using the previous Debian Stable
> distro on my 64 bit
> > architecture
> > and then found it would no longer work,
> apparently because of
> > an
> > optimizer bug in gcc, failing to build
> libxml2).
> >
> > I don't want to sound pessimistic (I often
> do!) but GUB is
> > very large,
> > especially when it is building Denemo (with
> LilyPond,
> > Ghostscript, font
> > generation, even LilyPond documentation
> generation thrown
> > in)...
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
> >
> > « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
>
> « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
>
>
>
>
> --
> Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
>
> « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
>
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, (continued)
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/22
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/23
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/23
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/23
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/23
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration,
Richard Shann <=
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/28
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/29
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/29
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Éloi Rivard, 2013/10/29
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Richard Shann, 2013/10/29
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Continuous Integration, Jeremiah Benham, 2013/10/31