[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 1.2.4
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 1.2.4 |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:50:18 +0100 |
I have now downloaded and tested the mingw installer
http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/gub/uploads/denemo-1.2.4-0.mingw.exe
built 16th of July, and it appears to be good for the release (I've
tested on a Windows Vista laptop).
Please can any Windows users please download and test either this or the
equivalent portable version:
http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/gub/uploads/denemo-mingw-1.2.4.zip
(which I have also tested).
If there are no problems we can copy these (and the GNU/Linux binary) to
http://www.denemo.org/downloads/ and announce the release at the
weekend.
Richard
On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 00:08 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> Gub is giving me issues as usual. It is being very unpredictable.
> Aubio failed to configure properly even when I am using the same gub
> code. It passes if I use python 2.6 in tools but it then will fail to
> build lilypond. There has to be a way to use the systems python
> instead of the tools version. I am working on a another mingw build
> now.
>
>
> Jeremiah
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Richard Shann
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> No sooner have I written this than I see a new version of the
> GNU/linux
> binary from today which runs correctly in a virtual machine
> with a
> Debian O/S. (I tested the earlier 9th July one, and that had
> problems).
>
> Let me know when there is a mingw and I'll give that a
> workout.
>
> Richard
>
>
> On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 12:34 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> > Jeremiah,
> >
> > Have you hit fresh problems with generating binaries? I'll
> be happy to
> > announce the release once we have at least the mingw binary
> for it. We
> > already have a Debian package and no doubt Suse and Fedora
> will follow
> > as soon as we announce.
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 16:31 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > Jeremiah,
> > >
> > > Unless you have some doubts about denemo.ttf being valid I
> think we
> > > should create the 1.2.4 branch and binaries. Will you have
> time for that
> > > over the weekend? I could announce the release Mon or Tues
> after some
> > > sanity-checking.
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>
>
>