[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] The 2.0.4 release (was Re: Last call for any bugs bef
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] The 2.0.4 release (was Re: Last call for any bugs before Release 2.0.4) |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:06:37 +0000 |
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 07:27 -0500, Yves de Champlain wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> 2.0.4 does indeed fix the build on Mac but I got the same warnings.
I take it that you see sensible palette labels on the left side, a
proper display with treble clef showing and menus with proper labels? So
I think we can put those error messages down to a naive assumption in
the Denemo code itself as to how it will be built.
I've filed a bug report for this.
Richard
> I thought it was a /opt/local prefix issue or that it was due to the
> fact of not using X11. The machine indeed had no denemo / lilypond
> history.
>
>
> yves
>
>
>
> > Le 7 mars 2016 à 05:04, Richard Shann <address@hidden> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 10:20 +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > > On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:01:26 +0000
> > > Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've given a sanity-check on
> > > > http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/denemo-release/denemo-2.0.4.tar.gz
> > > >
> > > > and this appears to me to be good for release.
> > >
> > > Custom built rpm + install => all seems to be okay.
> > >
> > > During startup, denemo gives a couple of warnings/errors:
> > >
> > > Denemo - WARNING : Failed to add font dir /usr/share/denemo/fonts.
> > > Denemo - CRITICAL: Could not find feta.ttf
> > > Denemo - CRITICAL: Could not find Denemo.ttf
> > > Denemo - CRITICAL: Could not find emmentaler.ttf
> > >
> > > The rpm build process puts the fonts in /usr/share/fonts/denemo
> > > (RedHat/Fedora conventions, %{_fontdir} macro).
> > >
> > > Despite the "CRITICAL", it seems to work.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how to fix this.
> >
> > Well, it may be that if you were installing on a machine with no
> > previous history of LilyPond or Denemo it could fail; that is the
> > fonts
> > may be present already. More likely they are installed, and are
> > picked
> > up, but the warnings from Denemo are based on naive assumptions.
> >
> > Thanks for the check!
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>
>