[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] A major re-structuring.
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] A major re-structuring. |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 22:09:52 +0000 |
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 15:47 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I have not copied the binaries and the tarball over.
>
They are in place now and can be accessed from
http://www.denemo.org/downloads-page/
Richard
>
> Jeremiah
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Richard Shann
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 19:42 +0000, Stuart Binder wrote:
> > I tried to get the Restructure branch to try it out, but it
> appears that all the download links (including Sourcecode)
> Jeremiah is going to move the binaries to the right place
> shortly. But
> the Restructure branch is just source code ...
>
> Thanks for trying!
>
> Richard
>
> > are broken. I'm getting a 404 on every platform.
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Richard Shann
> > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:14 AM
> > To: denemo <address@hidden>
> > Subject: [Denemo-devel] A major re-structuring.
> >
> > One of the most fundamental mistakes made when Denemo was
> first started was not to have a structure for a Denemo
> measure. Instead it is just a list of the objects in the
> measure. As a knock on effect, nothing can be stored with the
> measure that applies to the whole measure.
> > This has made it difficult to fix the way that information
> about the context (clef, timesignature ...) of an object is
> stored, especially when a measure has no objects. It has long
> been my ambition to get rid of the way the calculation of the
> context information is computed - a draw time. This is still
> causing failures in Check Score on occasions.
> >
> > As a start I have created a branch Restructure in which a
> staff now has a list of Measure structures, which for now just
> has one element, viz.
> > the list of objects.
> >
> > I've done a first trawl of all the code to try and make the
> change work properly, and I've tested (with the default build)
> loading files, starting new files, adding and deleting
> movements, staffs, measures, notes, chords, copy and paste
> creating snippets, pasting and following them Undo and Redo.
> >
> > It would not surprise me if I have missed something, it is
> perilous work. The symptoms of an error are crashes, often
> with memory allocation warnings. But, so far it seems good. If
> anyone can help testing this version that would be good!
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>
>
>