[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnustep smb library
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: gnustep smb library |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 10:50:44 -0800 |
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:31:31 +0100
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <Lars.Sonchocky-Helldorf@bbdo-interone.de>
wrote:
> On 03.12.2003 17:45:36 Enrico Sersale wrote:
[...]
> >- if yes, which name must I give to it, to avoid discussions about
> >"GS" prefixes :-).
[...]
> By the way nobody "vill cut off your johnson" if you name classes
> GS<SomeClassName> as long as this particular classes belong to
> GNUstep. The GS prefix acts here as namespace that is common to all
> classes of the framework. MusicKit for instance uses the prefix MK.
See http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/PrefixIndex
[...]
> Application Names like GSSomeThing don't really make sense especially
> if the application in Question is only _for_ GNUstep(and thereby also
> suited for Cocoa) but not part of it.
Besides, there's the habit of calling GNOME stuff G<something> already.
Apart from a possible confusion (is it for GNOME or GNUstep?) we should
"think different" ;-)
Oh, and KDE cra^Wstuff is called K<something>...
> Enough education for today, I step back from my role as teacher ;-)
> and suggest you to use SMBK as prefix for your classes (or is SK still
> available?)
See the link to WIKI. SMB isn't taken yet.
--
Chris