[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cocotron
From: |
Adrian Robert |
Subject: |
Re: Cocotron |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:44:04 -0500 |
On Dec 24, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Helge Hess wrote:
I'm not that much into developing-AppKit, but IMHO its a huge
difference whether you write AppKit just for Windows or whether you
also target X11 given that the two are vastly different. Personally
I would probably approach that by writing two entirely different
AppKit libraries instead of creating one huge monster abstracting
away the APIs inside yet another API ... (aka backends ;-)
The OpenStep idea is to have a common API, not being fixed on a
common implementation.
Hi,
The gui / backend division makes a lot of sense because (1) most of
the code in gui is and would always be drawing layer independent, and
(2) NeXT / Apple have always split things along similar lines.
(Also, compare the size of code in gui and back. We could also
compare size of GUI/back to Cocotron "WinAppKit" but can't yet
because functionality is so much less there.)
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/23
- Re: Cocotron, Helge Hess, 2006/12/24
- Re: Cocotron,
Adrian Robert <=
- Re: Cocotron, Tima Vaisburd, 2006/12/26
- Re: Cocotron, Renaud Molla, 2006/12/26
- Re: Cocotron, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2006/12/26
- Re: Cocotron, Renaud Molla, 2006/12/26
- Re: Cocotron, Tima Vaisburd, 2006/12/26
Re: Cocotron, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2006/12/26
Re: Cocotron, Tima Vaisburd, 2006/12/26
Re: Cocotron, Philippe C.D. Robert, 2006/12/26
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/23