[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thoughts about the future...
From: |
Riccardo Mottola |
Subject: |
Re: Thoughts about the future... |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Sep 2024 21:24:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.19 |
Hi,
Gregory Casamento wrote:
1) They haven't updated macOS significantly (Cocoa specifically) in a
few years. I've been keeping track since Catalina
2) Currently you can run UIKit apps on the mac if your mac uses Apple
Silicon.
3) They are aggressively phasing out Intel based macs.
I am wondering if these facts combined mean that they are thinking
about deprecating Cocoa within the next few years and going COMPLETELY
to using UIKit as the preferred framework for development.
Could happen... I always feared Apple would somehow merge iOS with
MacOS. Now... an intermediate step is iPadOS.
Also, not true they are not updating Cocoa, they are actively
deprecating a lot of stuff. Dumnifying it...
So yes UIKit or SwiftUI could become the "preferred" framework. Or only one?
1) We need to add support for macOS to GNUstep so that, in the case
that they DO deprecate Cocoa or ObjC (I hope they DO NOT) then the
people who use those have someplace to go
I don't know how interesting it would be. If XCode removes support for
things like NIB/XIB for Cocoa, a Cocoa compatibility layer would be of..
niche use at least.
You could use .gorm files with GORM, indeed, even use it to open legacy
IB files. Who knows.
2) We need to have a mobile library (UIKit compatible) to accommodate
those who might want to bring their applications to other things
outside of the stupidity of Apple's walled garden.
3) We need to add support for Swift (most likely by enabling the ObjC
extensions already present in the compiler on Linux)
We could do that, in a separate libray. But how interesting would it be?
We can also say... Bye Apple, it has been nice. You finally killed your
OpenStep legacy... we followed Cocoa, now we are on your own.
Honest answer: how many applications have been ported from Mac to
GNUstep in the past 5 years? How many of these are Open Source?
And vice-versa?
Although FOSS doesn't forbid it, I don't want to work for a Mac-useful
tool. I intend to work for something that contributes to FOSS Operating
Systems. Support of proprietary stuff is a nice collateral (e.g. Mac
compatibility, Windows or Solaris...) but only to the point that there
is a fallback to FOSS.
with an UI-kitted MacOS..... call it iMacOS (.. sarcasm ..) it will
become even less probable than it is now.
Riccardo