This is not the right question to ask,
The right question is "how to ensure that when there is the most download of dolibarr (September to March) the broadcast version (.2 like) is as stable as possible for novice users"
To answer this question we must look at the proposed roadmap with :
- .0 in april,
- .1 in june-july
- .2 in september
Bien cordialement,
Charlie Benke
De : address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden De la part de Christophe Battarel
Envoyé : mardi 13 octobre 2015 17:55
À : Posts about Dolibarr ERP & CRM development and coding <address@hidden>
Objet : Re: [Dolibarr-dev] Dolibarr 3.8.1 and freeze of Dolibarr 3.9
maybe you're right; in fact the main question is "what is a stable release ?"... i'm not even sure there is an answer !
Le 13/10/2015 17:39, Sasa Ostrouska a écrit :
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Christophe Battarel <address@hidden> wrote:
All i have to say about it is that a release should be qualified as stable when it is stable and not when it is the choosen date.
Exactly, so from this we can see that we are going back to the same scheme as we have right now if I get it correctly. We had many delays on some releases due to having a stable release released when it was really stable.
So the question then comes, is it sensate to change that kind of schedule ?
I used many times a .0 release to upgrade a previous install and then I saw that really a .0 release was never so stable as the .1 or .2 or ...
The .0 release always had some kind of downside or small bug in it. But I think this is a normal course of evolution. The invention is never perfect at its state (think of .0), there is always room to improve (think of .1 or .2 or . more).
My two cents.
Christophe
Le 13/10/2015 16:44, Sasa Ostrouska a écrit :
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Charles Benke <address@hidden> wrote:
Except dolibarr is not made ONLY for advanced users but also (especially) for simple users who do not have our production development expertise (never .0 ...)
WE must clarify their heavily that a .0 version is not made to be used in production (or at their own risk), otherwise they will do…
I think this is not much a sense, I would expect a .0 release to be a new one and stable, why do we have beta releases then ?
_______________________________________________
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
--
<small><i>Christophe Battarel<br/>
Responsable technique Altairis</i><br/>
+33 (0)9 52 71 70 96</small>
_______________________________________________
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
_______________________________________________
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
--
<small><i>Christophe Battarel<br/>
Responsable technique Altairis</i><br/>
+33 (0)9 52 71 70 96</small>