[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers
From: |
Tim Terlegård |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:05:23 +0100 |
> > > plus an appropriate set of libraries to handle lists, tuples,
> > > channels, etc.
> >
> > Why not add these as C# classes?
>
> 2. Augment pnetlib with interesting classes that
> support distributed application development, using
> Limbo as a guide to the features that are required.
Is it possible to make ECMA add classes for developing distributed systems?
As the demands (from the people) gets higher, almost all network applications
want replicaiton, fault tolerance etc. I'm surprised the C# classes from ECMA
doesn't include this.
-- Tim
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Michael Khaw, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, John, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/07
- Message not available
- Re: [DotGNU] Ada95 (was Inferno Papers), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers,
Tim Terlegård <=
Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Bill Lance, 2002/03/06