[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open
From: |
Bill Lance |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:13:23 -0800 (PST) |
What statement are you folks refering to? I can't
fins the previous messages.
--- Seth Johnson
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I think the likelihood is much more to do with
> content
> control schemes, that Mono probably doesn't have
> wind of
> yet.
>
> Seth Johnson
>
> Norbert Bollow wrote:
> >
> > The only explanation for this statement which I
> can see is
> > that the corporations in question are afraid of
> the possibility
> > of some kind of retaliation from Microsoft against
> companies
> > which contribute to the Mono libraries under GPL.
> If the
> > library is not copylefted anymore, then maybe
> Microsoft does
> > not see it as a threat anymore, and the
> managements of those
> > corporations would not be concerned about the
> possibility of
> > retaliation from Microsoft. This would clearly
> make the
> > decision to contribute easier.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden
>
http://subscribe.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Seth Johnson, 2002/03/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open,
Bill Lance <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Seth Johnson, 2002/03/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Seth Johnson, 2002/03/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Seth Johnson, 2002/03/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/11