[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC
From: |
Gopal.V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:29:24 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> The possibility to use the GCC as a front-end on the
> ast level and not on the rtl level has not been
> discussed yet. Maybe it would be of benifit to the
> DOTGNU?
That opens up a new can of worms. GCC based compiler
for IL. Will the AST level access favour the development
of Stack based languages using GCC ?
Gopal.V
PS: I found the 11.5 Mb download a bit heavy on my conn :(
--
The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
//===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
\\===<=>===//
- [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, S11001001, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/11
- new version of GPL? (was Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), S11001001, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Gopal.V, 2002/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Fergus Henderson, 2002/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Gopal.V, 2002/03/12