[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono...
From: |
Paolo Molaro |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono... |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 19:05:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
On 03/15/02 Gopal.V wrote:
> > recent criticism against Mono has IMO been unfair -- that really
> Who criticised ?. Me ?. The parent thread stated a fact.
> It's not my fault that lupus reacted , he didn't on the Mono list.
> Why here ?. (lupus your call).
I don't fancy flame wars, so I don't reply to random postings on the
mailing list. I only replied to your post here because
you lied about the original poster being a mono contributor.
I replied to another post of yours because the arguments you used
(mono needs ms sw while pnet doesn't) are false.
I respect your ideas and opinions, but you're not furthering the goals
of free-software with lies; you do it writing free software, building
awareness for freedom, spreading love for your friends.
Leave lies to the microsoft pr folks.
lupus
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
address@hidden debian/rules
address@hidden Monkeys do it better
Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 2002/03/15
Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 2002/03/15
Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Roland Ljungh, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., David Sugar, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 2002/03/15