[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and
From: |
Gopal.V |
Subject: |
Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC) |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:14:36 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> What is DOTGNU stance on CodeDom?
> That seems to be the essence of the introspector, but for .NET.
I think the first step towards a CodeDom would be completing the
System.Reflection.Emit classes.
> mono seems to support them in the System.CodeDom library, I think we should
> look into this.
> What do you think?
Certainly, supporting the CodeDom & CodeDom.Compiler will certainly
help us.
I'm really lost at how we should implement this -- should we base
it on our lower level functions ?.
Gopal.V
--
The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
//===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
\\===<=>===//
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), (continued)
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/15
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/15
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/15
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/20
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC),
Gopal.V <=
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/20
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/21
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/21
- OT: ilrun (was Re: [DotGNU]Introspector & Treecc), S11001001, 2002/03/14
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Gopal.V, 2002/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, David Sugar, 2002/03/12
Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, S11001001, 2002/03/21