Re: [DotGNU]Postmeeting VRS thinking and SEE

[S11001001]

Bill Lance wrote:
> I point this out here because I am now thinking that
> the freestanding VRS server is functionally that same
> as what SEE in envisioned to be.  Specifically, SEE
> and the Service Manger in the VRS could very well be
> the same thing.
>
> After talking with Dave, the continued development of
> SEE is very important at this stage.  That's
> especailly true as PNet starts to work.  It will need
> a server frontend to connect it to the internet.

I have the very limited start of a SEE specification document. I have not made 
any changes to the architecture described (sort of) based on any of the new 
ideas, such as Norbert's excellent jabber:middleware endorsement.

Now what I would like to know is, what sort of requirements are you looking 
for? Because if the SEE can play a role, that will add design constraints.

Anyway, here is what I've written so far, in case someone else would like to 
work on this, or use it as a base. Whatever.

http://www.geocities.com/pitabasic/dotgnu/seespec.texi.gz

--
Oh, I've seen copies [of Linux Journal] around the terminal room at The Labs.
        -- Dennis Ritchie