Re: [DotGNU]Re: Why DotGNU should use Jabber

[John]

Adam Theo wrote:
> As long as the data to be transferred between SEEs and SEE components is
> not binary, it can be sent over the Jabber network wrapped in Jabber
> packets to Jabber addresses.

> Now, if the data was binary, Jabber could still help by doing the
> metadata associated with that binary data, such as sending/receiving the
> searches and queries, setting up sessions, negotiating agreements and
> privacy contracts, etc... Jabber cannot do the binary itself due to a
> flaw in XML itself, not Jabber.

This is probably an elementary question, but...

Can the Jab-protocol transport binary encoded by stuffing it in between
tags defined to hold CDATA in a custom namespace? (not proposing a
method Xhex, UU, all the same to me)