[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft prohibits GPLed work via licensing of CIFS standa
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft prohibits GPLed work via licensing of CIFS standards |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Apr 2002 09:58:23 +1000 |
Seth Johnson wrote:
> Anybody know what these two patents cover?
I searched at:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/srchnum.htm
Patent 5,265,261, granted Nov 23, 1993:
Method and system for network communications
using raw mode protocols
Abstract
A method and system for sending data from a first computer
through a communications line to a second computer. The second
computer includes a redirector, a transport, a data buffer, and an
application program. The method and system provides the
transport with a read request to send data from the first computer
to the second computer, and with a receive network control
block which directs the transport to store the next data it
receives directly in the data buffer. The transport sends the
read request to the first computer. The first computer stores
the data identified by the read request in a data block without
a header. The first computer transmits the data block over the
communications line to the transport. Using information
contained in the network control block, the transport stores the
requested data without the header directly in the data buffer.
Seth posted the patent text, so I won't include that here.
Patent 5,437,013 has an identical abstract, with a grant date
of July 25, 1995.
I think they may be the same patent, filed twice in error.
The second has a disclaimer on it saying it doesn't apply
after Nov 23, 2010, which would be 17 years from the grant
date for the first patent.
I haven't delved into the patent claims yet to see what these
patents actually cover, and how they differ from each other.
The abstract is pretty generic.
Cheers,
Rhys.