|
From: | David Sugar |
Subject: | Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - first draft |
Date: | Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:50:50 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 |
If we as a society permit things like exclusionary practices common in proprietary software and granting of temporary monopolies on ideas because it benefits the profits of existing organizations at the cost of everyone's freedom, is this very different from saying let's suspend parts of the constitution for awhile because freedom is currently interefering with the ability of government to maximize it's policies?
Freedom as an ethic has nothing to say directly about pro or anti-business when taken in whole that I can see. That it can potentially prevent the rise of unnatural market monopolies and encourage more market diversity by loweing barriers to market entry is probably in the long run market neutral. One might even say in that role it can function as the invisible hand of capitalism immortalized by Adam Smith. As such, I cannot think of anything that is more pro-capitalist for the software market than Free Software.
No, I see nothing anti-business in the GPL. Richard Stallman wrote:
Some people call the GNU GPL/LGPL 'antibusiness'. They say 'It's not conducive to profit-making enterprise.' It is not conducive to the practice of making a profit by trampling our freedom and dividing our community. However, that practice is antisocial and ought to be discouraged one way or another. We encourage people to make a profit, as long as they respect our freedom and our community. _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list address@hidden http://subscribe.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |