[Libjit-developers] Re: [Pnet-developers] libjit licensing

[Klaus Treichel]

Hi,

changing the license of libjit to LGPL v2 or later is ok for me too.

Cheers,
Klaus

Am Freitag, den 04.01.2008, 00:47 +0600 schrieb Aleksey Demakov:
> Hi all,
> 
> Here we go again. Just before the libjit-0.1.0 release we discussed
> relaxing the libjit license. However his step has not been taken due
> to some disagreements.
> 
> I would like to bring up this issue again for the libjit-0.1.2 release.
> The reasons for relicensing libjit are as follows:
> 
> * other libraries with a similar scope use weaker licenses
>   (GNU lightning - LGPL, LLVM - something BSD-like)
> 
> * the current libjit license was already cited as one of the reasons
>   the project using it was abandoned  (http://tromey.com/blog/?p=16)
>   and  people keep voicing concerns about it as recently was the case
>   with the ruby-libjit.
> 
> So I would like to relicense libjit under LGPL v2 for the 0.1.2 release
> As far as I remember the last time we discussed it all the major
> contributors has already agreed on LGPL v2. Are there any abjections
> to this now?
> 
> Regards,
> Aleksey
> _______________________________________________
> Pnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pnet-developers

signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil